![]() ![]() “A higher religion is more difficult to believe. This particular approach failed to emphasise, (as was the case in Kantian Critical Philosophy), the intimate metaphysical relation between ethical laws and faith.Įliot argues that the more primitive state of the civilisation concerned, the greater the “identity-relation” between Religion and Culture. For many Analytical Philosophers, Religion became an epistemological problem, rather than an issue related to “Justification by Faith”. Perhaps his reluctance to use hylomorphic or critical analyses is rooted in the marginalisation of Religion that occurred as a result of the anti-metaphysical movements of logical atomism and logical positivism. Hits: 187 Photo by Ksenia Chernaya on Įliot claims to be adopting a sociological view when he is engaged upon the discussion of the unity and diversity of religious movements, and this is somewhat surprising considering his philosophical training and background. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |